Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T21DV03617
Case Details
Entered Date:
06/11/2021
Applicant:
MONICA S ESPINOZA
Description:
Dead Palm Tree branches over a fixed shed creating fire hazard and another half dead tree making mess in my yard
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T21DV03617
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: OBSTR DEAD TREES AND SHRUBS
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | None | Not Inspected |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T21DV03617
Case Description: OBSTR DEAD TREES AND SHRUBS
Total Completed Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2021 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GOODMAN | Approved | VISITED SITE, TREES IN QUESTION WERE IN THE REAR YARD OF THE PROPERTY, THERE WAS ONE TALL PALM TREE A COUPLE OF FEET AWAY FROM THE DIVIDING WALL THE DEAD PALM FRONDS WERE 12 FEET OFF THE GROUND AND NOT IN VIOLATION OF OUR TREE CODE. THE SECOND TREE WAS BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND THE DIVIDING WALL, VERY TALL AND DID HANG OVER THE WALL, NOT A LARGE AMOUNT. I DID SPEAK TO THE COMPLAINTANT WHO STATED HE DID WORK FOR THE CITY AT ONE TIME AS A ACCOUNTANT AND STATED IN 2006 RICK MENDOZA WAS OUT AND MADE THEM TRIM THE TREE. I INFORMED HIM THAT IN 2006 THE SITUATION MAY HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT, THE TREE HAD TO HAVE BEEN MUCH SMALLER. THE COMPLAINTANT ADDED HE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE TO CONTINUE PICKING UP THE DEBRIS IN HIS REAR YARD. I LOOKED OVER THE FENCE AND FOUND AT THE MOST A 15 MINUTE JOB TO REMOVE THE SMALL AMOUNT OF LEAVES IN THE CORNER OF HIS YARD AND FOUND NO PALM FRONDS IN THE YARD. I EXPLAINED I FELT THIS WAS A CIVIL MATTER AND ASKED IF HE HAS SPOKEN TO THE NEIGHBOR. THE COMPLAINTANT EXPLAINED THE PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE WERE RENTERS, I ASKED IF HE CALLED AND SPOKE WITH THE OWNER, HE STATED HE WOULD NOT DO THAT. I GAVE THE COMPLAINTANT MY BUSINESS CARD, EXPLAINED THIS WAS A CIVIL MATTER BETWEEN HIM AND THE NEIGHBOR, HIS METAL SHED WAS NOT IN DANGER OF BEING DAMAGED BY FIRE BUT IF HE QUESTIONED WHAT I HAD EXPLAINED TO HIM HE COULD CONTACT MY SUPERVISOR MARTIN ROMERO WHOS NAME WAS ADDED TO THE BUSINESS CARD. THERE ARE NO VIOLATIONS. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE. |