Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T21DV02435

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

MULTIPLE TYPES
Address:

Entered Date:

04/26/2021

Applicant:

WILLOW SPICEWOOD

Description:

JUNK MOTOR VEHICLES ON PROPERTY - TRASH AND REFUSE IN FRONT YARD - RV IN BACK POSSIBLY BEING OCCUPIED - RUNNING FOOD BUISNESS FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY

Outstanding Inspections

Case Number: T21DV02435
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: MULTIPLE TYPES
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE None Not Inspected

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T21DV02435
Case Description: MULTIPLE TYPES
Total Completed Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
05/06/2021 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT GOODMAN Approved VISITED SITE, ENTERED THE FRONT GATE, KNOCKED ON FRONT DOOR BUT RECEIVED NO ANSWER. I LEFT A BUSINESS CARD IN THE DOOR. THE FRONT YARD AREA WAS COVERED WITH A WOOD CHIP TYPE MULCH AND FOUND ITEMS THAT APPEARED TO BE IN USE, NO REAL JUNK OR DEBRIS. I LOOK OVER THE FENCE AND DID SEE THE R/V IN THE REAR YARD, IT DID NOT APPEAR THAT ANYBODY WAS LIVING IN THE R/V AND I COULD NOT SEE ANY HOOK UPS. THERE WAS NOT A FOOD TRUCK ON THE PROPERTY OR A FOOD TRUCK BUSINESS BEING RUN FROM THE PROPERTY AND THERE WAS NO SIGNAGE FOR A BUSINESS AND NOBODY WORKING OUT ON THE PROPERTY. I'VE BEEN HERE MANY YRS PREVIOUS AND IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPERTY HAS NOT CHANGED MUCH. I LATER RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE OWNER WHO STATED HE WAS UPSET BECAUSE HE WAS JUST IN COURT WITH INSPECTOR ROBERT GONZALEZ IN OCTOBER OF 2020. HE STATED HE ONLY OWNED TWO CARS AND THEY WERE IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY. I TOLD HIM I SAW BOTH CARS AND HAD NO ISSUES. I ASKED HIM TO BE ALLOWED TO CONTACT ROBERT GONZALEZ AND GO OVER THE COURT MATTER AND DETERMINE HOW THE PROCESS ENDED. I DID READ THE NOTES TO ROBERTS CASE AND ALL THE COURT PROCEEDINGS. I DID FIND THAT THE TWO BUILDING IN THE REAR WERE LEGALL. I FOUND THAT ROBERT NEVER VERIFIED THERE WAS ANY ONE LIVING IN THE R/V AND THERE WAS NOTHING ABOUT A FOOD TRUCK. OWNER WAS ASKED TO SCREEN THE PROPERTY WITH A PROPER SCREENING MATERIAL WHICH HE HAS DONE AND WHEN COMPLETED WAS FOUND COMPLIANT AND COURT CASE CLOSED. I LATER CONFIRMED WITH ROBERT THE PROCESS HE TOOK WITH THE OWNER TO BE ABLE TO BRING THE CASE INTO COMPLAINCE AND THAT THE SCREENING WAS PART OF THE ABATEMENT PROCESS. THE REAR BUILDING HAVE A LOT OF MATERIALS OUTSIDE OF THE SHEDS THAT IS BEING USED BY THE OWNER, I FOUND THE PROPERTY CHANGED LITTLE FROM THE WAY ROBERTS COURT CASE HAS LEFT IT. I HAVE NO FURTHER ISSUES. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.