Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T21DV00044

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Address:

Entered Date:

01/05/2021

Applicant:

DONOVAN MARJORIE A & JEFFERY A CP/RS

Description:

Resident is building a fence into the alley beyond his property limits

Outstanding Inspections

Case Number: T21DV00044
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE None Not Inspected

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T21DV00044
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
01/11/2021 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT GOODMAN Approved I VISITED THE SITE AND MET WITH THE OWNER WHO STATED THAT ANOTHER INSPECTOR HAD ALREADY BEEN BY (RICHARD VIDAL) AND THAT THEY HAD GONE OVER EVERYTHING ALREADY, THEY TALKED ABOUT THE CARPORT THAT WAS TOO CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE, THE PORCH THAT WAS PARTIALY REMOVED FROM THE FRONT BECAUSE IT HAD BEEN ADDED AND NOT DONE CORRECTLY. I ASKED ABOUT THE AWNING OVER THE WASHER /DRYER AND THE OWNER STATED HE WAS TOLD BY CLAYTON TREVYLLIAN THAT THE AWNING WOULD NOT REQUIRE A PERMIT BUT THAT THE HOTWATER HEATER WOULD REQUIRE A METAL ENCLOSRER AND THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN INSTALLED. WE THEN MOVED TO THE FENCE, OWNER STATED THE BEFORE HE BUILT THE SHED HE SPOKE WITH DSD AND WAS TOLD ANYTHING 200 SQ FT AND UNDER WOULD NOT REQUIRE A PERMIT BUT DID NEED TO MEET SETBACKS. THE SHED WAS JUST UNDER 8 FT, AND UNDER 25 FT WIDE, I MEASURED THE SHED AND IT WAS JUST UNDER 8' X 25'. THE SETBACKS HOWEVER WERE 5 FT 8 INCHES. THE FENCE WAS BUILT EXACTLY TO MATCH THE FENCE LINE OF THE PROPERTY NORTH OF AND ACROSS THE STREET. THE OWNER LATER SENT ME PICTURES SHOWING ME THAT THE PROPERTY LINE WAS STILL BEYOND THE FENCE LINE. A NOV WAS ISSUED BY RICHARD VIDAL REQUIRING A DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OPTION FOR THE FENCE. THE OWNER STATED HE HAS ALREADY OBTAINED THE PAPERWORK FROM DSD. I CHECKED PERMITS PLUS TO VERIFY RICHARD VIDALS INSPECTION AND NOV. I FOUND PERMITS FOR THE ELECTRICAL TO THE SHED, A REFRENCE PLAN FOR THE SHED, AND A PERMIT FOR A STREET CUT IN THE FRONT FOR THE NEW DRIVE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE HOUSE. OWNER ALSO IN THE PROECESS OF REMOVING TREE CUTTINGS THRU BRUSH AND BULKY. OWNER IS MOVING FORWARD HAS OBTAINED PERMITS AND DDO AS REQUSTED BY RICHARD VIDAL IN CASE #T20DV05080. INSPECTOR MOVES TO CLOSE THIS PARTICULAR CASE AS OWNER IS COMPLYING WITH RICHARD VIDAL CASE. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.