Case: T17DV05624
Case Details
Entered Date:
10/27/2017
Applicant:
JAMES F BRADY
Description:
RMIN: Bedroom window does not lock; electric may not be up to code (no specifics); palm tree fronds touching house; dilapidated fence
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T17DV05624
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2017 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GOODMAN | Approved | VISITED SITE, CONTACTED MANAGEMENT BEFORE ARRIVINGTO DETERMINE WHAT WAS GOING ON DUE TO SUCH MINOR ISSUES. SPOKE WITH SHELLY OF MEG MNAGEMENT, SHELLY STATED ISSUES STARTED WHEN OCCUPANT REMOVED THE FENCE/GATE WITHOUT PERMISSION, REINSTALLED IT WHEN ASKED TO HOWEVER DID NOT DO A GOOD JOB. MANAGEMENT HAD THERE MAINTANENCE PEOPLE COME OVER AND INSTALL FENCE PROPERLY AND MANAGEMENT CHARGED OCCUPANT FOR THAT. SINCE THEN OCCUPANT IS CALLING AND HARRASING THEM AND CALLING IN MINOR ISSUES. MY INSPECTION FOUND PALM TREE IN THE FRONT YARD NOT AN ISSUE, 6 FT AWAY FROM THE FRONT PORCH AND 16 FT TALLER THAN THE STRUCTURE, AND 6 FT AWAY FRM THE FRONT PORCH. >FENCE IS NOT LISTING OR LEANING, APPEARS TO BE FAIRLY NEW. > OLDER HOUSE. ALL WINDOWS ARE CASEMENT WINDOWS, ALL WINDOWS CLOSE, SOME DO NOT LOCK. THIS WAS A VISUAL FROM OUT SIDE. >CALLED OCCUPANT WHO WAS NOT HOME AND ASKED ABOUT THE ELECTRICAL, HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE ISSUES ARE BUT STATED IT WAS OLD. OCCUPANT ASKED IF I COULD COME BACK BY TO REINSPECT. |
| 12/11/2017 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GOODMAN | Approved | REVISITED SITE FOUND PALM FRONDS WERE REMOVED MORE THAN 10 FT AWAY FROM STRUCTURE. >DELAPIDATED PORTIONS OF THE REAR FENCE WERE REPLACED >WINDOW LOCKS WERE INSTALLED AND WERE KEEPING THE WINDOWS COMPLETELY CLOSED AND LOCKED. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE. |