Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T16DV06524

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Address:

Entered Date:

09/27/2016

Applicant:

WINGED FOOT INVESTMENT SVCS LP

Description:

LEAKING ROOF THROUGHOUT UPSTAIRS AND DOWNSTAIRS, LACK OF COOLING/AC, TERMITE INFESTATION.

Outstanding Inspections

Case Number: T16DV06524
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 3
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
12/15/2016 NPO(HC)-COOLING GOODMAN Item closed
12/15/2016 NPO(DL)-DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE GOODMAN Item closed
12/15/2016 NPO - INSECTS/PESTS GOODMAN Item closed

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T16DV06524
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
10/17/2016 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT GOODMAN Approved VISITED SITE, MET WITH OWNERS OF THE BUSINESS OCCUPYING THE STRUCTURE, WEST POINT CONTRACTORS.ALEX OF W/P CONTRACTORS SHOWED ME SEVERAL AREAS AND PROVIDED PICTURES WHERE THEY HAD CEILING LEAKS FROM THE PAST RAINS. PICTURES SHOWED ME WHERE THE LEAKS HAD BEEN BUT OWNERS HAD SINCE MADE CEILING REPAIRS. PRIOR TO MEETING THE BUSINESS OWNERS I HAD WALKED ONLY A PORTION OF THE ROOF DUETO THE ROOF BEING A FOAMED ROOF. AN UPPER SECTION OF ROOF WAS CLEAN BUT DRAINAGE DID NOT LOOK LIKE IT WAS DRAINING PROPERLY BUT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF PONDING.I COULD SEE THE SCUPPERS FOR THE LOWER PORTION OF THE ROOF ON THE FAR SOUTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, ALTHOUGH I COULD NOT GET TO THEM, I DID NOT SEE ENOUGH DEBRIS AROUND THE ROOF MOUNT SCUPPER THAT WOULD CLOG THE DRAINING PROCESS, HOWEVER THE FOAM ROOF HAD DIVETS AND MAY AFFECT ROOF DRAINAGE. I WILL MEET WITH RICK FIRST TO REVIEW THE CASE. ** DID MEET WITH RICK SADATE, EXPLAINED THE COMPLAINTS AND SHOWED HIM THE PICTURES FROM WHEN THE CEILING FIRST LEAKED AND EXPLAINED THE REPAIRS TO THE CEILING HAVE BEEN MADE AND I WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE ROOF DEFECTS PROVIDIED IN THE PICTURES. I ALSO EXPLAINED THAT I DID NOT SEE THE LOWER ROOF PORTION (FIRST FLOOR) BECAUSE THE FOAM ROOF CAN BE EASILY DAMAGED WHEN WALKED ON. RICK FELT THAT CODE WOULD NEED TO SEE THE LEAKY ROOF WHEN THE CEILING WAS DAMAGED AND REMOVED TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF ROOF SHEATHING DAMAGE. HE FELT THAT FROM PICTURES INSULATION HAD BEEN REPLACED, AND DRYWALL REPLACED BY THE OWNER. rICK ASKED I SIT ON THE CASE FOR A WHILE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE FURTHER COMPLAINTS
12/15/2016 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE GOODMAN Approved MET WITH RICK SALDATE, WENT OVER CASE A 2ND TIME AND EXPLAINED THAT WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY FURTHER COMPLAINTS AND WE HAVE HAD RAINS SINCE THAT TIME. CLOSE CASE PER RICK.

Completed Activity Special Conditions

Case Description - RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Case Number - T16DV06524
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 1
Date Name
12/15/2016 VIOLATION CLOSED