Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T15DV01321
Case Details
Entered Date:
02/24/2015
Applicant:
JOHN T JR & ADELA A PELLERITO JT/RS
Description:
shed is enroching the property line not meeting set backs
Case Violations
Case Number: T15DV01321
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Violations: 1
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 04/10/2015 | UDC, Sec. 6.6.2(C), (D). ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES In all zones, the buildings used for accessory uses shall comply with the following: C. An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s); D. Accessory structures, such as light poles, flagpoles, and other tall and narrow structures that are similar, shall be exempt from the setback requirement. Amateur radio towers are exempt from the setback requirement and are allowed to a maximum height of 100 feet. |
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T15DV01321
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2015 | LUC - ZONING OTHER | NAVARRO | Item closed |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Number: T15DV01321
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2015 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | NAVARRO | Approved | Visited site, knocked on door, met owners son, discussed the reason I was there and that there was a compliant on the property and if asked permission to enter property to do my initial , he then stated yes, I proceeded and found a follows, there was a shed approximaetly ten foot by ten foot by eight foot approximately four feet from the property line, I then knocked on the door, owners son asked if every thing was fine, I then stated to him that it was not and that the shed was to close to the property line and needed to be moved approximately two feet to the east to have the shed in compliance, I then gave him my business card and wrote my city cell phone number on the card and explained to him that I would be sending a notice of violation to his father for the shed being to close to the property line and if his father had any questions to please feel free to contact me.I then told the son to have a good day and left the premise.I will write a notice of violation |
| 08/04/2015 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | NAVARRO | Approved | Visited site, inspected, found shed moved, property in compliance, will appear in court. |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Case Number - T15DV01321
Case Status: COURTCMP
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 8
| Date | Name |
| 04/17/2015 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 04/14/2015 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 04/08/2015 | CONTACTED BY EMAIL |
| 07/07/2015 | CERTIFIED RECEIPT CARD |
| 04/14/2015 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 05/27/2015 | CITATION ISSUED |
| 11/01/2016 | VIOLATION CLOSED |
| 08/05/2015 | COURT HEARING INFO |