Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T14DV10035
Case Details
Entered Date:
12/09/2014
Applicant:
WCCP TUCSON WEST LLC 88.278% & PEA ENTERPRISESLLC 4.982% & PVP INVESTMENTS LLC
Description:
PROPERTY OWNER HAS INSTALLED SIGNS AND HIRED SECURITY TO DIVERT PEDESTRIANS AROUND THE BACK OF THE BUILDING ON THE RIVER TRAIL.
Case Violations
Case Number: T14DV10035
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Violations: 2
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 01/27/2015 | UDC, Sec. 10.2.3. COMPLIANCE REVIEW, EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Any land used or occupied; any site improvement, modification, or construction started; any existing use or structure expanded, reconstructed, changed, or otherwise altered; and any land divided into multiple parcels without certification of compliance with the provisions of the UDC through a zoning review process is considered a violation of the UDC. Enforcement of violations shall be in accordance with Section 10.4, Penalties and Remedies. |
| 01/27/2015 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.5. VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN Failure to comply with conditions placed on an approved site plan shall constitute a violation of the UDC. |
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T14DV10035
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/09/2014 | LUC - VIOL OF SITE PLAN - COND | MENDOZA | Item initialized |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T14DV10035
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/15/2015 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GOODMAN | Approved | THIS CASE WAS CLOSED PRIOR TO INSPECTION DUE TO AN EMAIL SENT FROM MIKE WYNEKEN STATING CITY OFFICIALS HAD ALREADY CONTACTED THE OWNER OF PROPERTY AND INFORMED THEM THEY COULD NOT MAKE PEDESTRIANS WALK AROUND THE BUILDING. MET WITH TWO DIFFERENT SECURITY GUARDS ON SITE, BOTH HAD THE SAME STORIES STATING AT ONE TIME THEY WERE TOLD TO MAKE PEDESTRIANS FROM BOTH THE BUS STOP ON THE WEST SIDE AND WALMART MALL TO THE EAST WALK THE RIVER WALK BEHIND THE BUILDING. MENTIONED RECEIVED CALL FROM TWO CITY OFFICIALS AND SECURITY WAS INFORMED TO REMOVE SIGNAGE AND ALLOW PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC TO WALK THE SIDEWALK AREA INFRONT OF THE BUILDING. I WAS ABLE TO OBSERVE PEDESTRIANS WALKING THE SIDEWALK AREA IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING, AND THERE WAS NO SIGNAGE PROHIBITING PASSAGE. VIOLATION ABATED. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE. |
| 02/12/2015 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GOODMAN | Approved | INSPECTION FOUND SIGNS HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM BOTH THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. COMPLIANCE CLOSE CASE. |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - COMMERCIAL ZONING
Case Number - T14DV10035
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 3
| Date | Name |
| 01/28/2015 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 01/28/2015 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 06/12/2015 | VIOLATION CLOSED |