Case: T14DV07587
Case Details
Entered Date:
09/18/2014
Applicant:
MC COWN FAMILY TR ATTN: STEVEN R & JOYCE T MC COWN TR
Description:
ROOF LEAK THROUGH OUT THE UNIT (MOSTLY IN KITCHEN) / PLUMBING LEAK BY BATHTUB / DRYWALL WATER DAMAGE / CONCERNED ABOUT WATER HEATER LOCATION / THERMOSTAT APPEARS TO BE DAMAGED.
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T14DV07587
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2014 | NPO - INT. BUILDING MAINTENANC | GOODMAN | Item closed |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Case Number: T14DV07587
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2014 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GOODMAN | Approved | VISITED SITE, RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT THE DOOR. CONTACTED OWNER STEVE MCGOWN WHO I SPOKE TO THIS WEEK ABOUT UNIT #4, ASKED HIM WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH UNIT #15, MR MCGOWN STATED THAT THESE TENANTS ALSO WERE GIVEN A 5 DAY EVICTION NOTICE. NO VIOLATION / CLOSE CASE. |
| 09/29/2014 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GOODMAN | Approved | RECEIVED EMAIL FROM RICK ASKING I UPDATE ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE. I EXPLAINED TO RICK THAT I HAD BEEN OUT TO THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO INSPECTOR UNIT#3& 4 BUT FOUND THEM VACANT DUE TO EVICTION. SHORTLY AFTER I INSPECTED THIS PROPERTY, NO ONE HOME. CALLED OWNER AND WAS INFORMED THEY HAD ALSO BEEN EVICTED. LATER SPOKE WITH TENANT KIKKA WHO INFORMED ME OF EVICTION, WAS NOT CURRENT ON RENT AND WAS HOLDING BACK OWNERS RENT. RICK SALDATE TOOK IN ALL MY INFORMATION AND THEN CALLED TENANT KIKKA WHO THEN CHANGED STORIES OF EVICTION PROCESS, RICK INFORMED HER I WAS OUT AND NOBODY WAS HOME, SHE INFORMED RICK THAT SHE NO LONGER LIVES THERE, HAD TO MOVE BUT STILL HAD ACCESS TO THE UNIT AND STILL WANTED US TO INSPECT THE UNIT. RICK S. SET UP A REINSPECTION, KIKKA MENTIONED SOMEONE WOULD BE OUT RIGHT AWAY TO OPEN THE UNIT. I WAITED 1 HOUR BEFORE I DROVE TO THE ADDRESS, ARRIVED AND FOUND NO ONE THERE. KNOCKED ON DOORS AND WINDOWS AND NO ANSWER. I DID GET ON THE ROOF FOUND A LARGE AREA OF THE ROOF HAD BEEN PATCHED, AND SAW THAT THE ENTIRE ROOF HAD BEEN WELL MAINTAINED, ROOF LOOKED LIKE IT HAD BEEN RECENTLY COATED. THE ODD PART WAS THAT THE ROOF PITCHED FROM WEST TO EAST AND AN ADDED AREA PITCHED EAST TO WEST AND A GUTTER LOOKING AREA RAN WATER OFF TO THE CARPORT AREA. SO IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE ROOF LEAKS OR PONDS AT THAT GUTTER AREA WHICH IS PART OF THE AREA THAT WAS RECENTLY PATCHED. I LATER WENT BACK BY AND MET WITH OCCUPANT VIKING BROGER WHO SAID THE ROOF LEAKED IN EVERY ROOM AND THAT THERE WERE OTHER ISSUES. I ENTERED THE UNIT EVEN THOUGH THE UNIT WAS VACANT. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF ROOF LEAKS ON THE CEILING OR WALLS, BUT THE EMPTY UNIT HAD BEEN CLEANED AND POSSIBLY PAINTED SINCE THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF LEAKS ** AFTER MY INSPECTION I GOT WITH RICK AND ASKED HIM IF WE HAD JURISDICTION ON THAT PROPERTY DUE TO THE UNIT BEING VACANT. I EXPLAINED THAT THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF LEAKS, WE TALKED OF THE OTHER ISSUES BROUGHT UP DURING THE INSPECTION OF THINGS NOT ON THE VIOLATION REPORT. RICK STATED WE DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION ON THE UNIT AND WETHER OR NOT I SPOKE WITH OR MET WITH THE OWNER WAS UP TO ME. ** I ALSO QUESTIONED MARTIN ROMERO ON WHETHER OR NOT WE HAD JURISDICTION. EXPLAINED ALL MY FINDINGS, AND MARTIN AGREED WE HAD NO JURISDICTION AND DID NOT FEEL THAT WE HAD TO PURSUE THE ISSUES. NO JURISDICTION, NO VIOLATION/ CLOSE CASE. |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Case Number - T14DV07587
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 1
| Date | Name |
| 09/26/2014 | RESEARCH |