Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

RESIDENTIAL FIRE

Entered Date:

04/29/2013

Applicant:

MARIO & NOEMI GARCIA CP/RS

Description:

LAUNDRY ROOM FIRE

Outstanding Inspections

Case Number: T13DV02784
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL FIRE
Total Outstanding Inspections - 2
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
07/08/2013 NPO(EL)-WIRING/SWITCH/OUTLT/FX GGOODMAN Item closed
07/08/2013 NPO(DL)-DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE GGOODMAN Item closed

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T13DV02784
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL FIRE
Total Completed Inspections - 2
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
04/27/2013 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT JVALDEZ Approved TFD EMERGENCY CALL OUT, ON SITE INSPECTION RESULTS: LAUNDRY ROOM FIRE. THERE IS DAMAGE TO THE OVERHEAD EXHAUST FAN AND THE DRYWALL HAS SMOKE DAMAGE. THE WASHER BREAKER DID TRIP. I COULD SEE WIRES BURNT AND EXPOSED IN THE FAN LOCATION. I SHUT THE POWER OF TO BREAKER NUMBER 8 WASHER, 11 GAS DRYER, 28 GENERAL LIGHTS. THE DRYER IS GAS BUT HAD NO HEAT DAMAGE TO THE REAR OF THE UNIT. TFD SHUT THE GAS OFF TO THE ANGLE STOP OF THE DRYER. THE SMOKE DAMAGE WAS CONTAINED TO THE LAUNDRY ROOM ONLY. ALL DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOS HAVE BEEN SCANNED INTO SIRE. SCHEDULE A 60 DAY FOLLOW UP INSPECTION FOR INSPECTOR GERALD GOODMAN.
07/08/2013 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE GGOODMAN Approved CONTACTED OWNER OF PRO RESTORATION AFTER SEEING THE PHOTOES TAKEN BY JUAN VALDEZ. EXPLAINED THAT A PERMIT WAS REQUIRED. KEN WAS ADAMANT THAT A PERMIT WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED DUE TO THE FAN FIXTURE WAS THE PROBLEM AND NOT THE SWITCH OR WIRING. HE STATED THE WIRING WAS BURNT ONLY AT THE POINT OF CONNECTION OF THE FAN, AND THE FAN ITSELF WAS BURNT, AND WIRE NUTS MELTED. ONLY A SMALL PATCH WAS DONE TO THE DRYWALL AND THE SMOKE DAMAGE WAS ADDRESSED BY A CLEANING PRODUCT. I SPOKE TO MARTIN ROMERO ABOUT A PERMIT BEING REQUIRED OR COULD I OVER RIDE THE PERMIT ISSUE DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS EXPLANATION OF THE DAMAGE, AND DUE TO MY EXPERIENCE OF THE WORK PRO RESTORATION HAS DONE IN OTHER JOBS. MARTIN STATED THAT IF I FELT A PERMIT WAS NOT REQUIRED THAT I COULD OVER RIDE THE PERMIT ISSUE. DUE TO WHAT I FOUND IN THE PICTURES AND THE EXPLANATION BY PRO RESTORATION I DO ELECT TO FOR GO THE PERMIT ISSUE ONLY AFTER TALKING TO RICK HOLLANDER AND EXPLAINING THE THE WIRING AND FAN FIXTURE ISSUE TO RICK. RICK AGREED THAT IF THE WIRING WAS INSTALLED INCORRECTLY DAMAGE WOULD PROBABALY EXTENDED FURTHER INTO THE FAN SWITCH, WIRING, AND FIXTURE. BREAKER DID ITS JOB BY KICKING OFF , JUAN DID HIS JOB BY FURTHER TURNING OFF OF ADDTIONAL BREAKERS. PERMIT NOT REQUIRED, ALL WORK COMPLETED. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.

Completed Activity Special Conditions

Case Description - RESIDENTIAL FIRE
Case Number - T13DV02784
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 5
Date Name
04/29/2013 CONTACTED BY PHONE
04/29/2013 CONTACTED BY MAILING
04/29/2013 NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED
08/22/2013 VIOLATION CLOSED
04/29/2013 CALLBACK

Documents

File Name Document Type  
P4080031.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080032.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080033.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080034.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080035.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080036.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080037.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
P4080038.JPG DOCUMENTS VIEW
10137 E HONEY MESQUITE DR.PDF DOCUMENTS VIEW