Case: T13DV00731
Case Details
Entered Date:
02/04/2013
Applicant:
PETER JOHN STEFAN CASTELLANO
Description:
New AC unit installed without a permit.
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T13DV00731
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Outstanding Inspections - 3
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | None | Not Inspected | ||
| 04/10/2013 | NPO(HC)-COOLING | GGOODMAN | Item closed | |
| 04/10/2013 | NPO - WORK WITHOUT PERMIT | GGOODMAN | Item closed |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Case Number: T13DV00731
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2013 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GGOODMAN | Approved | VISITED SITE, KNOCKED ON DOOR, RECIEVED NO ANSWER.WHILE WALKING UP TO THE PROPERTY I DID SEE A NEW CONDENSER ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. TRIED CONTACTING THE OWNER PETER CASTELLANO, WHILE ON SITE, RECEIVED NO ANSWER. CHECKED THE CONDENSER CLOSER, THE CONDENSER WAS NEW, CONDUIT FOR THE ELECTRICAL LOOKED LIKE IT WAS EXISTING, THE BREAKER BOX LOOKED NEW. ** 2/06/2013 MADE CONTACT WITH THE TENANT, WOULD NOT GIVE HER NAME, MENTIONED THE UNIT WAS REPLACED BECAUSE IT WAS STRUCK BY LIGHTING. TENANT GAVE ME A DIFFERENT NUMBER FOR THE OWNER. **2/07/2013 CALLED OWNER WHO STATED THE CONDENSER WAS STRUCK BY LIGHTING AND HAD TO BE REPLACED BUT THAT THE UNIT IS PLACED IN THE ATTIC SPACE OF THE STRUCTURE AND IT WAS NOT AFFECTED. MR CASTELLANO GAVE ME THE CONTACT NUMBER FOR MIKE, OWNER OF ABLAZE HEATING & COOLING TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT WAS DONE. **CONTACTED MICHAEL RIECH OWNER OF ABLAZE. MR RIECH MENTIONED THAT ONLY THE CONDENSER WAS CHANGED OUT, CONDENSER FAILED, IT WAS DURING A STORM. ELECTRICAL WAS NOT CHANGED OUT AS BREAKERS AND ELECTRICAL WERE ALL IN GOOD CONDTION. SAME RECOMMENDED CONDENSER REPLACED THE FAILED CONDENSER. MR RIECH MENTIONED THAT THE COMPLAINT PROBABLY CAME FROM IN HOUSE, HE HAD TO FIRE HIS OWN SON AND A SECOND EMPLOYEE. THEY HAVE STARTED THEIR OWN COMPANY AND CONTINUE TO CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR MR RIECH, HE HAS HAD TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY BECAUSE OF THIS. ***CONTACTED LEE RAY HANLEY TO DETERMINE IF A PERMIT WOULD BE REQUIRED. *** HAD TO CONTACT LEE RAY A SECOND TIME, LEE RAY FELT THAT IF THE CONDENSER WAS CHANGED OUT BECAUSE IT FAILED, AND NOT UPGRADED AND NO ELECTRICAL CHANGED OUT THEN HE WOULD NOT REQUIRE A PERMIT BECAUSE HIS INSPECTORS WOULD BE DOING THE SAME THING I WAS, MAKING A JUDGEMENT CALL. DUE TO THERE BEING NO IMMINENT HAZARDS AND NO UPGRADES THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED/ NO VIOLATION |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Case Number - T13DV00731
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 1
| Date | Name |
| 04/11/2013 | VIOLATION CLOSED |