Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T11DV07729
Case Details
Entered Date:
09/27/2011
Applicant:
ROLLING HILLS STATION LLC ATTN: PHILLIPS EDISON & CO
Description:
Fence in alley is in disrepair, maybe a violation of site plan.
Case Violations
Case Number: T11DV07729
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Violations: 2
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 10/28/2011 | T.C. Ch. 16, Sec. 16-12(e) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. All accessory structures, including but not limited to detached garages, fences and walls, must be structurally sound and free of disrepair. Examples of disrepair include missing slats, posts or blocks, or damage, deterioration or rot. Fences and walls cannot be constructed or covered with materials not designed or commonly used for that purpose, such as pallets and tarps. Fences and walls must be properly anchored so as not to be in danger of failure or collapse. |
| 10/28/2011 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.5. VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN Failure to comply with conditions placed on an approved site plan shall constitute a violation of the UDC. |
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T11DV07729
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2011 | LUC - VIOL OF SITE PLAN - COND | RMENDOZA | Notice of violation |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T11DV07729
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2011 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | RMENDOZA | Approved | CHAIN LINK FENCE DAMAGED AND MISSING ON THE WEST AND SOUTH PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY. |
| 06/07/2012 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | RMENDOZA | Approved | TRANSPORTATION STATES THAT THE FENCE WAS NOT INSTALLED BY THE CITY NOR MAINATINED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON. OWNER IN PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS STATED DID NOT INSTALL THE FENCE. REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW A FENCE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. APPEARS THAT THERE ARE NO REQUIREMENT THAT I COULD FIND THAT REQUIRE A FENCE AT THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. QUITE POSSIBLE THAT A PREVIOUS OWNER MAY HAVE INSTALLED THE FENCE. CASE TO BE CLOSED. |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - COMMERCIAL ZONING
Case Number - T11DV07729
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 8
| Date | Name |
| 03/15/2012 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 10/31/2011 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 04/03/2012 | CONTACTED BY EMAIL |
| 01/20/2012 | CERTIFIED RECEIPT CARD |
| 10/31/2011 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 06/07/2012 | VIOLATION CLOSED |
| 03/20/2012 | RESEARCH |
| 01/11/2012 | REINSPECTION FEE - FIRST |