Case: T11DV06826
Case Details
Entered Date:
08/26/2011
Applicant:
HABER TRUST AGREEMENT
Description:
Redwood fence not being maintained in alley. Part was knocked down from a truck. Violation of site plan? Caller said they have letter from DSD requiring either a fence or Oleander hedge be there. Complainant would like call from inspector.
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T11DV06826
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2011 | LUC - VIOL OF SITE PLAN - COND | KTARKET | Item initialized | |
| 08/26/2011 | NPO(DL)-DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE | KTARKET | Item initialized |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Case Number: T11DV06826
Case Description: COMMERCIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2012 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | AVINDIOL | Approved | 08/21/12 - ARRIVED ON SITE TO FIND WOOD FENCE ON BOTH EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE ALLEY // SECTIONS MISSING IN THE MIDDLE OF PROPERTY // FENCE STANDING IS SECURE // WILL HAVE TO RESEARCH TO SEE IF THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT APPROVED OR FILED AT DSD // IF NOT THIS WOULD BE A PRIVATE PROPERTY ISSUE // AV |
| 08/22/2012 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | AVINDIOL | Approved | 08/22/12 DID NOT FIND ANYTHING ON FILE AT DSD // MET WITH MANNY PADILLA AT DSD TO RESEARCH AS WELL AGAIN COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING // THERE WAS NO REZONING EITHER IN THIS AREA WHICH MIGHT HAVE FACILITATED SUCH AN AGREEMENT EVEN THE NEW CONSTRUCTION ON THE CORNER DID NOT HAVE TO GO THRU REZONING IT USED EXSISTING C1 ZONE // ANY AGREEMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETWEEN BOTH PARTIES AND WAS NOT ON FILE // WILL MOVE TO CLOSE OUT THIS CASE // AV |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - COMMERCIAL ZONING
Case Number - T11DV06826
Case Status: NOVERIFY
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 1
| Date | Name |
| 08/23/2012 | VIOLATION CLOSED |