Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T10DV01770
Case Details
Entered Date:
04/01/2010
Applicant:
SHEILA RAE GILMORE
Description:
Work without permits; zoning - setbacks
Case Violations
Case Number: T10DV01770
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Violations: 1
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 04/01/2010 | T.C. Ch. 16, Sec. 16-4. PERMITS REQUIRED. Unless otherwise exempt pursuant to section 301 of the Administrative Code, as adopted by reference per section 6-1 of this Code, or pursuant to any other ordinance or statute, no building, structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter or by the technical codes adopted by the city shall be built, erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, moved, improved, removed, converted or demolished unless a permit first has been obtained from the building official in the manner provided in the administrative and building codes adopted by the city. The purpose of a permit is to ensure that all construction is inspected by qualified City of Tucson personnel as directed by ordinance to verify compliance with city codes. Failure to obtain proper permit with inspections and approvals shall deem the construction to be unsafe. |
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T10DV01770
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Outstanding Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2010 | LUC - ZONING OTHER | PUMPHREY | Court Inspection | research |
| 10/18/2010 | NPO - WORK WITHOUT PERMIT | PUMPHREY | Court Inspection | research |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Number: T10DV01770
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2010 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | LPUMPHRE | Approved | Attached carport or ramada type structure on south side of main structure is over 200 sq. ft and exceeds height of main structure. Metal storage unit over 200 sq ft is also on south side of property and does not meet setbacks from property line; both require permits. |
| 10/06/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | PUMPHREY | Approved | No compliance. |
Outstanding Case Activity Conditions
| Date | Name | Approved |
| 04/01/2010 | LAND USE CODE SEC. 3.2.5.2 (C) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES An accessory structure, which exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure, shall comply with the perimeter yard width requirements of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). Accessory structures, such as light poles, flagpoles, and other tall and narrow structures that are similar, are exempt from the setback requirement. | Not Approved |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Case Number - T10DV01770
Case Status: COURTCMP
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 11
| Date | Name |
| 06/11/2010 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 06/11/2010 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 12/07/2010 | CONTACTED BY EMAIL |
| 04/01/2010 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 07/30/2010 | CITATION ISSUED |
| 01/27/2011 | VIOLATION CLOSED |
| 07/30/2010 | COURT HEARING INFO |
| 06/11/2010 | RESEARCH |
| 06/11/2010 | REINSPECTION FEE - FIRST |
| 07/28/2010 | REINSPECTION FEE - SECOND |
| 08/24/2010 | REINSP FEE - PAID IN FULL |