Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T07FR01013

Case Details

Status:

COMPLETE

Type:

INSPECTION
Address:

Entered Date:

05/25/2007

Applicant:

FRONTIER VILLAGE LLC 90.33%

Description:

Full Fire Prevention Inspection conducted 5/25/07

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLETE
Case Number: T07FR01013
Case Description: INSPECTION
Total Completed Inspections - 3
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
05/25/2007 INSP - FULL DGREENLE Approved Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) is for same type occupancy, but has the wrong name on it. Sprinkler inspection approved 5/1/07. Business is eligible for TFD's Self Inspection Program (SIP). *** Due to security concerns, you may appeal these code violations to the Fire Marshall. A Petition to Appeal has been provided. [Appeal denied unless certain conditions met].
05/25/2007 VIOL - MEANS OF EGRESS DGREENLE Approved TFC 1008.1.8 - Door operations. Except as specifically permitted by this section egress doors shall be readily openable from the egress side. Exceptions: 2. In buildings in occupancy... Groups B... the main exterior door or doors are permitted to be equipped with key-operated locking devices from the egress side provided: 2.1. The locking device is readily distinguishable as locked, 2.2. A readily visible durable sign is posted on the egress side on or adjacent to the door stating: THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. The sign shall be in letters 1 inch (25mm)high on a contrasting background, 2.3. The use of the key-operated locking device is revokable by the fire code official for due cause. TFC 1008.1.8.5 - Unlatching. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. _____ The front door shall confrom to the 2003 edition of the Tucson Fire code. ***
08/28/2007 INSP - REINSPECTION BCOBB Approved Teresa will call 9/14/2007 with a plan from a fire service co. to comply with Fire Marshals ruling on the magnetic door, which is still in place at this time. [Appeal was denied, unless stipulations met per letter dated 7/11/2007 by Ch. Uthe.]