Case: T07DV07326
Case Details
Entered Date:
08/06/2007
Applicant:
BARAJAS JAVIER & ROSEMARY P CP/RS
Description:
ROACH INFESTATION, MANAGEMENT HAS SPRAYED BUT ISSUE HAS PERSISTED OVER 10 MONTHS.
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T07DV07326
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GGOODMAN | Approved | ON SITE, FOUND ROACH INFESTATION, TOOK PICS. WAITING ON CALL-BACK FROM XAVIER APT "C". CALLER NOT SURE IF HE WANTS TO PURSUE DUE TO RETALIATION OF OWNER. TENANT MENTIONED HE WAS SECTION 8. ALSO MENTIONED THAT THE ROACH INFESTATION WAS NEVER CALLED INTO OWNER JAVIER BARAJAS. VICTOR DEJESUS DID ASK IF TENANT WAS CURRENT ON RENT, TENANT JAVIER MENTIONED HE WAS- PAYS MONTH TO MONTH AND WOULD BE PAYING AUGUST RENT ON 08/08/07. VICTOR TOLD TENANT THAT HE NEEDED TO INFORM OWNER OF THE INFESTATION AND IF THAT DID NOT WORK THEN DNR WOULD ISSUE AN NOV. AT THAT POINT TENANT DID NOT WANT TO PURSUE THE COMPLAINT. |
| 08/09/2007 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GGOODMAN | Approved | ASKED VICTOR DEJESUS TO CALL TENANT JAVIER, VICTOR DID SO AND JAVIER MENTIONED THAT OWNER JAVIER BARAJAS DID STOP BY AND SPRAYED ALL UNITS. I CALLED OWNER JAVIER BARAJAS AND MENTIONED I RECEIVED A CALL ABOUT ROACH INFESTATION IN THE COMPLEX. JAVIER MENTIONED HE WAS THERE YESTERDAY AND SPRAYED ALL 8 UNITS BECAUSE IF ONLY ONE UNIT IS SPRAYED HE KNEW THE ROACHES WOULD JUST GO TO THE NEXT UNIT. JAVIER BARAJAS MENTIONED HE PLANNED ON SPRAYING AGAIN IN 2 WEEKS. BECAUSE TENANT HAD NOT INFORMED OWNER PRIOR TO OUR VISIT OF THE INFESTATION AND ASKED OWNER TO SPRAY AFTER OUR VISIT, AND BECAUSE OWNER SPRAYED ALL 8 UNITS INSTEAD OF JUST UNIT "C", DNR INSPECTOR GOODMAN CHOOSES TO CLOSE THE CASE AS OWNER HAS BEGUN THE ABATEMENT PROCESS WITHOUT DNR HAVING TO INTERVENE. COMPLIANCE CLOSE CASE!! |