Case: T05DV00322
Case Details
Entered Date:
04/26/2005
Applicant:
BLUM GINNY T FAMILY LIVING TR (THE)
Description:
COMPLAINT:MIN HOUSING-SKYLIGHT IN BEDROOM IS LEAKING. CEILING DAMAGE IN 2ND BEDROOM HAS CEILING DAMAGE AND CEILING LEAKS.
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T05DV00322
Case Status: INVALID
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | None | Not Inspected |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: INVALID
Case Number: T05DV00322
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2005 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GGOODMAN | Approved | 5/13/05 PRIOR TO VISITING SITE, I CALLED OWNER GINNY BLOOM, GINNY MENTIONED THAT IT HAD TAKEN SOME TIME AND LEG WORK, BUT THAT SHE FINNALY HAD GOTTEN HER INSURANCE COMPANY TO GET OVER AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE PROBLEM AND THEN TO HAVE THEM BEGIN THE BIDDING PROCESS TO BEGIN THE WORK ALSO TOOK SOME TIME, AND THE WORK TO RESOLVE THE ROOF PROBLEM IS NOW IN PLACE. MENTIONED THAT SHE COULD NOT MEET ME ON SITE BUT THAT I COULD GO BY AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE WORK IN PROGRESS.INFORMED HER THAT I WAS IN ROUTE TO INSPECT. VISITED SITE, SPOKE WITH TENANT MARVIN JEREW, EXPLAINED WHY I WAS THERE. MARVIN MENTIONED THAT HE NO LONGER NEEDED THE CITY'S ASSISTANCE THAT THE OWNER'S INSURANCE COMPANY WAS ALREADY HAVING THE WORK TAKEN CARE OF. I ASKED IF I COULK COME IN AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE WORK. HE SAID NO THAT AT THIS TIME BETTER WAY SEVICES HAD THE ROOM BLOCKED OFF AND HAD WATER EXTRACTORS IN THE ROOM AND RUNNING AT THIS TIME. ASKED MARVIN IF HE NEEDED ANY ASSITANCE OR OTHER DNR SERVICES, HE SAID NO, IGAVE HIM A CARD WITH CONTACT NUMBERS AND LEFT THE SITE. PICTURES OF THE EXTERIOR OF TRI-PLEX WERE TAKEN. CALLED BETTER WAY SERVICES ( STEVE QUILLEN OWNER) TO VERIFY THAT THEY WERE DOING THE WORK AT THE SITE, FORST SPOKE TO JIM WHO VERIFIED THAT THEY WERE DOING THAT JOB, JIM CONNECTED ME WITH DOUG, JOB SUPERVISOR, WHO ALSO VERIFIED THAT IT WAS A MOLD REMIDIATION,THEY PULLED THE CEILING IN A BEDROOM AND THAT THE OWNERS ROOFER WAS DOING THE ROOF REPAIRS FOR THE OWNER. DOUG MENTIONED THATTHEY DID NOT PULL PERMITS FOR THE DRYWALL BECAUSE IT WAS A SMALL JOB. DNR HAS NO CASE/ CASE CLOSED |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Case Number - T05DV00322
Case Status: INVALID
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 1
| Date | Name |
| 08/01/2005 | VIOLATION CLOSED |