Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T03DV00209

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Address:

Entered Date:

03/03/2003

Applicant:

EVENCHIK HARVEY B TR

Description:

COMPLAINT:MIN HOUSING-FIRE DOOR IS BROKEN

Outstanding Inspections

Case Number: T03DV00209
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
03/23/2003 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT JHURD Correction Required 3/20/03, VISITED SITE, TOOK PICTURES, WALKED COMPLETE SITE, 4 BUILDINGS AND 3 FLOORS PER BUILDING, UNIT HAS A TOTAL OF 36 FIRE DOORS ON SITE, AND ABOUT 23 OUT OF 36 DID NOT OPERATE PROPERLY, EITHER HANDLES WERE BROKEN OF DOORS SAGED TO WHERE THEY WOULD NOT CLOSE IN THE FRAME, OR DOOR CLOSERS WOULD NOT ALLOW DOORS TO CLOSE COMPLETELY, TALKED WITH JESSIE WHO IS NOW THE NEW MAINTENANCE SUPERVISIOR ON PROPERTY AND HE HAD STATED THAT HE ALSO HAD WALKED ALL BUILDINGS AND THAT HE IS IN PROCESS OF REPLACING AND REPAIRING ALL DOORS HE HAS ALL READY REPLACED SOME AND IS REPAIRING OTHERS EXPLAINED TO JESSIE THAT I WOULD BE SENDING A N.O. FOR REPAIRS, I ASKED JESSIE HOW MUCH TIME HE WOULD NEED TO REPAIR OR REPLACE DOORS HE STATED A COUPLE OF WEEKS I EXPLAINED TO JESSIE I WOULD WRITE N.O. FOR 30 DAYS HE STATED HE WOULD HAVE DOORS COMPLETED BY THEN. 30 DAY F/U

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T03DV00209
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
04/14/2003 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE JHURD Approved 3/27/03, REVISITED SITE TO HAND DELIVER A N.O. AND HAD FOUND THAT T.F.D. HAD BEEN CALL OUT ABOUT THE FIRE DOORS ALSO AND THAT T.F.D. HAD GIVEN THE PROPERTY 2 DAYS TO MAKE REPAIRS, WHEN I FOUND OUT THIS I STATED TO JESSIE MAINT. SUPERVISIOR AND TO JAMES MANAGER THAT T.F.D. WOULD TAKE PRESIDENCE OVER THE MATTER AND THAT THEY NEEDED TO FOLLOW WHAT T.F.D. WAS REQUESTING. CLOSE CASE.