Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: CE-VIO0323-02666
Case Details
Entered Date:
03/29/2023
Applicant:
N/A
Description:
Completed Inspections
Case Status: Closed - Resolved
Case Number: CE-VIO0323-02666
Case Description: URBAG - Rooster (Ward 3)
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | Passed | REVISITED THE SITE, MET WITH THE OWNER AND I ASKED IF HE HAD REMOVED THE ROOSTER, HE STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SHOW ME AND WALKED ME TO THE FREEZER AND SHOWED ME THE ROOSTER CUT UP IN THE FREEZER. I ASKED IF I COULD CHECK THE CHICKEN COOP. HE WALKED TO THE COOP AND ALLOWED ME TO ENTER, I FOULD NO ROOSTER IN THE COOP. NOV WAS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THE SHORT TIME FRAME. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE. | |
| 03/30/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Initial | In Violation | VISITED SITE, MET WITH THE OWNER WHO STATED THAT HE DID HAVE A ROOSTER ON THE PROPERTY. I INFORMED HIM THAT ROOSTERS WERE NOT ALLOWED IN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THAT HE WOULD NEED TO REMOVE THE ROOSTER FROM THE PROPERTY. OWNER ASKED IF HE COULD HAVE JUST A COUPLE OF DAYS. I STATED I WOULD BE BACK ON MONDAY AND IF THE ROOSTER WAS NOT GONE I WOULD ISSUE A NOV AT THAT TIME. |